Part 1: In Defense of The Obligation of Niqab

The attacks upon Islām never cease by the ‘modernists’ and those who claim to be ‘progressive’. As of recent, they have turned their poisonous attacks the Muslim woman. They have begun by attacking her religious right to wear the Niqab. The Niqab is the article of clothing worn upon the face of a woman, generally tied at the back of the head or using elastic to maintain its position. Niqab is a wasīlah (means) to fulfilling what the majority of the scholars deem ‘awrah (the part of a persons body that must be covered on front of non-related opposite gender). A Muslim teacher in the UK said on a Muslim forum,

    “The fact is, niqaab is not fard, and I’m not knocking it, I want to wear it myself…”

Seekingilm.com’s staff thus feels obliged to correct such a claim and defend the stance that it is obligatory for the free woman to cover her face in front of the ajnabī (non-related, marriageable man, in front of whom the woman must cover her ‘awrah). It is our hope that this article will, at the least, assist the laywoman in her honest research regarding the niqab. We will also try our utmost to keep the article brief so as to not overwhelm the researcher with information. We have set up a step process for the researcher to follow in understanding this issue.

Lastly we would like to state that this article is by no means misogynistic or patriarchal. Rather, Muslims certainly believe that the divine laws legislated for women are liberating and originally progressive. May Allāh grant us all tawfīq, Āmīn!

Step 1: Understanding the Issue of ‘Awrah

In order to grasp the issue of the niqāb or burqa’ etc, it is necessary to understand the basis for wearing it. Women wear niqāb because they believe the face of a woman is ‘awrah (again, the ‘awrah is the part of a persons body that must be covered on front of the non-related opposite gender). Many of the Fuqahā’ have divided ‘awrah into different branches. For example,

Imām Ibn Al Qayyim Al Jawziy (rahimahullah), explaining the woman’s ‘awrah said,

    “The ‘awrah is of two types: an ‘awrah in the Salāh (prayer) and an ‘awrah in looking (’awratu fin-nathr). So as for the free woman, it is (allowed) for her to pray while her hands and face are uncovered, and it is not (allowed) for her to go out in the markets and gatherings of people like that (i.e. it is not allowed for her to go out without the face and hands covered).[See Tahthīb As-sunan and 'Ilām Al Muwaqi'īn 2/80]

Imām Ash-Shirwāni said, “[Imām] Ziyādi in Sharh Al-Muharar said: For a woman there is three ‘Awrahs,

    1) ‘Awratu-fis-Salāh (the ‘awrah of prayer) – and that was mentioned before – It is everything of the body except the face and the hands.
    2) The ‘Awrah with regards to an un-related man looking at her: It is the entire body including the hands and the face, according to (the opinion that is) relied upon.
    3) The ‘awrah in privacy and amongst her Mahrams (those people related to her and un-marriable): It is like the ‘Awrah of men. [i.e. from her navel to her knees].

This division was also mentioned by the virtuous Shāfi’ī jurist, Imām Taqiyud-Dīn As-Subkī when he said,

    “And what is the closest (in opinion), from what our companions have produced is that the face and the hands of a woman are ‘awrah in nathr (i.e. looking) and not in the Salāh.”

[Quoted by Imām Al-Khatīb Ash-Shirbinī in his Al-Mughnī Al-Muhtāj.]

They draw this conclusion upon many different transmitted and rational proofs. Most of those we shall mention in this article, inshā’Allāh.

Now that we have explained the issue of ‘awrah, and that a woman’s ‘awrah changes in situations, we can understand the context in which a woman is obligated to cover her face. That is when a ajnabī (un-related, non-mahram man) will see her face. Obviously in other circumstances or out of necessity (durūrah) she is not obligated. Al-Qādhī Ibn Al-‘Arabī states,

    “And all of the woman is ‘awrah; her body, her voice, and it is not permissible for her to uncover that unless out of necessity, or need such as witnessing (in court), or a disease that is affecting her body…” [Ahkām Al Qur'ān 3/1579]

Step 2: Understanding the Proofs for the Woman’s Face Being ‘Awrah

The Qur’ān, the Sunnah (transmitted reports from the Prophet Muhammad (SAWS)), and the actions of the earliest Muslim Community are replete with legal proofs for the woman’s face being ‘awrah. We shall present many of those here without trying to overburden the reader with proofs.

The proof used by erudite Hanbalī Jurist of his time Imām Mansūr Al-Bahūtī (rahimahullah) was the following Sahīh (rigorously authentic) hadīth,

الْمَرْأَةُ عَوْرَةٌ فَإِذَا خَرَجَتْ ‏ ‏اسْتَشْرَفَهَا ‏ ‏الشَّيْطَانُ

    “The woman is ‘Awrah, when she leaves [her home] Shaytān (satan - may Allah (SWT) curse him) looks at her.”

This hadīth is reported by Imām At-Tirmidhi in his Sunan. He stated after the hadīth, “It is Hasan Sahīh Gharīb.” Similar to it is reported by Imām At-Tabarāni in his Kabīr, Ibn ‘Adiy, Imām Ibn Khuzaymah in his Sahīh (#1685), Al-Bazzār in his Musnad (#2061), and Ibn Hibbān in his Sahīh [#5598]. Imām ‘Ali ibn Abi Bakr Al Haythami said after reporting this hadīth, “Its men (reporters) are trustworthy.” [See Majma' Az-Zawā'id #2116] Muhammad ibn Nāsir Al-Albāni stated in his Irwā’ Al Ghalīl, “I say: It is Sahīh (authentic)!” [See Irwā' Al Ghalīl #273]

Ibn Khuzaymah has the additional wording, “…and the nearest she is to her Lord’s countenance is in the privacy of her house.” [Also narrated by Ibn Hibban in his Sahih, #5599]

This hadīth clearly states the entity of he woman is ‘awrah. Notice that the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallallāhu ‘alayhi wa Sallam) is implying that this is when “she leaves her home”. Thus, when foreign-unrelated men are able to see her face she becomes completely ‘awrah fin-nathr.

Qur’ānic and Narrative Evidence

The First Āyah 33:53


يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لَا تَدْخُلُوا بُيُوتَ النَّبِيِّ إِلَّا أَن
يُؤْذَنَ لَـكُمْ إِلَى طَعَامٍ غَيْرَ نَاظِرِينَ إِنَاهُ وَلَـكِنْ إِذَا
دُعِيتُمْ فَادْخُلُوا فَإِذَا طَعِمْتُمْ فَانتَشِرُوا وَلَا مُسْتَأْنِسِينَ
لِحَدِيثٍ إِنَّ ذَلِكُمْ كَانَ يُؤْذِي النَّبِيَّ فَيَسْتَحْيِي مِنكُمْ وَالله
لَا يَسْتَحْيِي مِنَ الْـحَقِّ وَإِذَا سَأَلْتُمُوهُنَّ مَتَاعًا فَاسْأَلُوهُنَّ
مِن وَرَاءِ حِجَابٍ ذَلِكُمْ أَطْهَرُ لِقُلُوبِكُمْ وَقُلُوبِهِنَّ وَمَا كَانَ
لَـكُمْ أَن تُؤْذُوا رَسُولَ الله وَلَا أَن تَنكِحُوا أَزْوَاجَهُ مِن بَعْدِهِ
أَبَدًا إِنَّ ذَلِكُمْ كَانَ عِندَ الله عَظِيمًا

    “O you who believe! Enter not the Prophet’s houses, except when leave is given to you for a meal, (and then) not (so early as) to wait for its preparation. But when you are invited, enter, and when you have taken your meal, disperse, without sitting for a talk. Verily, such (behaviour) annoys the Prophet, and he is shy of (asking) you (to go), but Allâh is not shy of (telling you) the truth. And when you ask for anything you want, ask them from behind a Hijāb, that is purer for your hearts and for their hearts. And it is not (right) for you that you should annoy Allâh’s Messenger, nor that you should ever marry his wives after him (his death). Verily! With Allâh that shall be an enormity. (Al-Ahzāb 33:53)

The specific reason this āyah was revealed is narrated by Anas ibn Maalik, who was the servant of the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa ‘alaa Aalihi wa sallam).

He said,

    “When the Messenger of Allah (SWT) (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa ‘alaa Aalihi wa sallam) married Zaynab bint Jahsh (radhiyallahu ‘anhaa), he invited the people to eat, then they sat talking. When he wanted to get up, they did not get up. When he saw that, he got up anyway, and some of them got up, but three people remained sitting. The Prophet wanted to go in, but these people were sitting, then they got up and went away. I came and told the Prophet that they had left, then he came and entered. I wanted to follow him, but he put the screen between me and him. Then Allah (SWT) revealed the āyah…” [Sahīh Al Bukhāri]

Some say that this āyah pertains only to the wives of the Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa ‘alaa Aalihi wa sallam). Others say that it is ‘Aam (general) in meaning and thus pertains to all believing women. The view that it is general seems to be sounder as you will come to know, Insha’Allah (SWT).

The following are the reasons why the proper opinion is that the Hijāb is for all the believing women, not just for the mothers of the believers.

Firstly, Amongst the Usool (principles) of Islām is,

 

العبرة بعموم اللفظ لا بخصوص السبب

    “The lesson is with the generality of the statement, not with the specific reason (for revelation).”

The point being, this āyah was specifically revealed for the Nabi (SAWS) (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa ‘alaa Aalihi wa sallam) and his wives. However, there is generality within the words of this āyah that makes the ruling of Hijāb a universal ruling.

Allah (SWT) states the reason why the Hijāb must be between the wives of the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa ‘alaa Aalihi wa sallam) and the men. He says,


وَإِذَا سَأَلْتُمُوهُنَّ مَتَاعًا فَاسْأَلُوهُنَّ مِن وَرَاءِ حِجَابٍ ذَلِكُمْ
أَطْهَرُ لِقُلُوبِكُمْ وَقُلُوبِهِنَّ

    “And when you ask for anything you want, ask them from behind a Hijāb. That is purer for your hearts and for their hearts…”

The fact of the matter is, universally, both men and women have this flaw that must be warded off. The cure for this flaw is the purification through Hijāb. So the flaw within the heart is universal, thus the ruling must be universal. As Allah (SWT) says, “that is purer for your hearts [kum at the end of the Qulūb (hearts) denotes plural for all males] and for their hearts (Hinna at the end of Qulūb denotes the plural form for females).”

Due to the fact that this problem of the heart (lust or attraction) is general, then the ruling also must be general. Those who restrict this āyah would be saying that this illness (or impurity) is only specific to the wives of the Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa ‘alaa Aalihi wa sallam) and the Sahābah. That is a ridiculous claim, or else Allah (SWT) would not have revealed the many other āyat we are going to discuss pertaining to Hijāb. The ruling of this āyah being universal was mentioned by Imām ibn Jarīr At-Tabari when he said after explaining,

‘…and when you ask for anything you want, ask them from behind a Hijāb ‘,

He said explaining, “and if you ask the wives of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa ‘alaa Aalihi wa sallam), and the Believing women who are not your wives, for something…” [See Tafsir At-Tabari regarding this āyah.]

Imām Muhammad Al-Amīn Ash Shinqītī also stated that this was a general ruling in his Adhwaa’ ul Bayān, and he stated under this āyah, “So know, that Hijāb is wājib (obligatory) by the proofs of the Qur’ān upon All Women!”

The Mufassir (explainer of Qur’ān) Abu Bakr Al Jassas also said, “And the meaning is ‘Aām (general)…” [See Ahkāmul Qur'ān by Abu Bakr Al Jassās.]

The Mufassir Al Faqīh (jurist) Al Imām Al Qurtubī in his Tafsīr also says “…and included in that (the rulings in this verse) is all women…” And then he goes on to say that ‘from the principles of the Sharee’ah is that all of the woman is ‘awrah, her body and voice, as has been mentioned before. So it is not permissible to unveil that except for a need such as testifying (or witnessing in court etc.), or an ailment that is affecting her body…” [See Jāmi' Ahkāmul Qur'ān under this āyah.]

Secondly, a supporting proof that proves that the salaf (the generations of the past i.e. Sahabah etc.) understood this āyah to be universal is a narration from Umm Salamah that follows.

Umm Salamah (Radhiya Allahu ‘Anhā) said,


لما انقضت عدتي من أبي سلمة أتاني رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فكلمني , بينه
وبيني حجاب , فخطب إلي نفسيتت

    “When my ‘Iddah (This type of ‘iddah refers to the 4 months and 10 days of mourning that Allah (SWT) has legislated for a woman after her husband passes away) ended from [the death of] Abi Salamah, Rasūlullah (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) came and spoke to me and between him and I was a Hijāb, and so he proposed to me…”

This hadeeth is reported in the Tabaqāt of Ibn Sa’ad beneath the chapter of Umm Salamah. It is also found in Siyār Al-’Allām An-Nubalā’ Vol. 2 204-205 and Bidayah wan-Nihayah. All of its men are the men of the two Sahīhs.

This narration supports the argument that this āyah is general due to the fact that Umm Salamah was not one of the wives of the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam), yet she still was using the Hijāb between her and the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam).

Some may argue that the Hijāb is a screen or barrier that the woman puts between her and the one who is asking. We agree that placing a screen between the man and the woman is part of Hijāb, however it is not the only variable of Hijāb to be applied. So the woman puts a barrier between her and the one asking, yet when she comes out of her home she has no barrier? This approach does not make any logical sense. How is it that Allah (SWT) would legislate a barrier that conceals the woman from the man in the home, but when leaving the home, which is a greater fitnah as was stated in the hadīth, “when she leaves her home Shaytān looks up to her”, there is no barrier? Both men and women still have this disease when she is outside of her home. Thus, Allah (SWT) has prescribed the Hijāb to purify the hearts of the people by putting a barrier between the believers and fitnah (trials etc.).

Another proof that this is not only for the wives of the Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa ‘alaa Aalihi wa sallam) is due to the fact that there is absolutely no proof to restrict it to be specific, whereas the āyah itself uses general meaning when discussing the Hijāb.

The Second Āyah 33:32-33


يَا نِسَاءَ النَّبِيِّ لَسْتُنَّ كَأَحَدٍ مِّنَ النِّسَاءِ إِنِ اتَّقَيْتُنَّ
فَلَا تَخْضَعْنَ بِالْقَوْلِ فَيَطْمَعَ الَّذِي فِي قَلْبِهِ مَرَضٌ وَقُلْنَ
قَوْلًا مَّعْرُوفًا * وَقَرْنَ فِي بُيُوتِكُنَّ وَلَا تَبَرَّجْنَ تَبَرُّجَ
الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ الْأُولَى وَأَقِمْنَ الصَّلَاةَ وَآتِـينَ الزَّكَاةَ وَأَطِعْنَ
الله وَرَسُولَهُ إِنَّـمَا يُرِيدُ الله لِيُذْهِبَ عَنكُمُ الرِّجْسَ أَهْلَ
الْبَيْتِ وَيُطَهِّرَكُمْ تَطْهِيرًا

    “O wives of the Prophet! You are not like any other women. If you keep your duty (to Allâh), then be not soft in speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease (of hypocrisy, or evil desire for adultery, etc.) should be moved with desire. Speak in an honorable manner. And stay in your houses, and do not display yourselves like that of the times of ignorance, and perform As-Salât (Iqamât¬as¬Salât), and give Zakât and obey Allâh and His Messenger. Allâh wishes only to remove Ar¬Rijs (evil deeds and sins, etc.) from you, O members of the family (of the Prophet), and to purify you with a thorough purification.” (Al-Ahzāb 33:32-33)

Ibn Kathīr said explaining these āyāt,

    “This is the ādāb (manners and etiquettes) that Allah (SWT) ta’alā commanded the women of the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa ‘alaa Aalihi wa sallam) with so that they would be an example for the women of the Ummah to follow. [Tafsir ibn Katheer (arabic version 3/482)]

The previously mentioned principle of generality applies to this verse also. Indeed it is harām in Islām to imitate the people of Jahaliyyah. Allah (SWT) here says,

    “And stay in your houses, and do not display yourselves like that of the times of ignorance…”

So these commands are also for the believing women, who have fear of Allah (SWT) and hope for his Mercy.

The Third Āyah 33:59


يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْـمُؤْمِنِينَ
يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ذَلِكَ أَدْنَى أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا
يُؤْذَيْنَ وَكَانَ الله غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا

    O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their Jalābīb all over their bodies. That will be better, that they should be known (as free respectable women) so as not to be annoyed. And Allâh is Ever Oft¬-Forgiving, Most Merciful. (Al-Ahzāb 33:59)

Allah (SWT) ta’alā has commanded the pure wives of the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam), His virtuous daughters, and His noble women followers to cover their entire body. The apparent message of this Āyah is that there is no difference between the clothes of the wives of the Prophet (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam), His daughters, and the believing women. This Āyah is a refutation to those who state that “covering the face is only for the wives of the Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam)!”

How is it that it is only for the wives of the Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) when Allah (SWT) ta’alā has ordered the Nabi (SAWS)’s daughters and the believing women of this Ummah to wear the exact same clothing as the Mother of the believers?

Allah (SWT) ta’alā has commanded the pure wives of the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam), His virtuous daughters, and His noble women followers to cover their entire body.

What is Jilbāb and How is it Worn?

When we look to the Sunnah, statements of the Sahābah and tabi’een, we see that Jilbāb is the garment that is brought over the head of a woman and laid upon her face. The following narrations are proof for this definition:

Proof 1: The First Narration of ‘Aa’ishah


حدثنا هشيم . قال : حدثنا الأعمش ، عن إبراهيم ، عن الأسود ، عن عائشة رضي الله
عنها قالت : « تُسدل المرأة جلبابها من فوق رأسها على وجهها »

“Hushaym informed us saying, Al-’Amash informed us, from Ibrāhīm, from Al-Aswad, from ‘Aa’ishah (radhiyallahu ‘Anhā) that she said,

‘The woman is to bring down her Jilbāb from over her head and [then place it] upon her face.’ ”

This is reported by Sa’eed ibn Mansoor. Al-Haafith ibn Hajr mentioned it in his Fat-hul Bāri 3/406. Ibn Al-Qayyim said in his Badā’I’ Al-Fawā’id: “Its chain is Sahīh upon the conditions of the two Shaykhs (Muslim and Bukhāri).”

It is also reported by Abu Dāwood in Al-Masā’il from Imām Ahmad from Hushaym with the same chain. In that chain however, the word Al-Mara’ah (the woman) is replaced with “Al-Muhrimah” (the woman in the state of Ihrām). Both narrations are Sahīh.

Notice the statement of ‘Aa’ishah, “Al-Mara’ah” (the woman). This word is general and for all women! This shows us that ‘Aa’ishah, with her knowledge of the language and fiqh, knew that the Jilbāb was that which covered the entire body, including the face.

Proof 2:


عن عائشة قالت : ” كان الركبان يمرون بنا ونحن مع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم
محرمات فإذا حاذوا بنا سدلت إحدانا جلبابها من رأسها على وجهها فإذا جاوزونا كشفناه
” .
رواه أبو داود ( 1833 ) وأحمد ( 24067 ) . وقال الشيخ الألباني في ” جلباب المرأة
المسلمة ” /107 : وسنده حسن في الشواهد .

It was narrated that ‘Aa’ishah said:

    “The riders used to pass by us when we were with the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in ihrām (the sacred state one enters when going to hajj or ‘Umrah). When they came near, each of us would lower her Jilbāb from her head over her face, and when they passed by we would uncover (our faces).”

[Narrated by Abū Dāwūd, 1833; Ahmad, 24067. This chain is hasan due to supporting reports in meaning. This hadīth has also been narrated by Umm Salamah and Asmā' bint Abu Bakr by Al Hākim and he stated it was sahīh and Imam Adh-dhahabi agreed with Him.]

Major Points of Benefit of this hadīth are:

a) ‘Ai’ishah (may Allah (SWT) be pleased with her), was obeying the command of Allah (SWT) ta’ala in Surat Al-Ahzaab by wearing Jilbāb and bringing it over the head ‘Ala (upon) the face. This shows us how the Jilbāb is worn.

b) Some people state that what A’ishah (radhiya Allahu ‘Anhaa) did was wrong. That is because of the hadīth reported by Abdullah ibn ‘Umar in the Sahīh of Imām Al Bukhāri that states,

    “It was narrated that ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: “A man stood up and said, ‘O Messenger of Allaah, what kind of clothes do you command us to wear during ihraam?’ The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: ‘Do not wear a shirt or pants or a turban or a burnous (hooded cloak). If one of you does not have any sandals then let him wear the khuffayn (leather slippers) and cut them so that they come below the ankle. Do not wear anything that has been dyed with saffron or turmeric. Women in ihrām should not wear niqaab or gloves.” [(Narrated by al-Bukhāri , the book of Hajj; Muslim, 1177).]

The response to this is very simple for the one who reflects. Niqaab is a separate piece of clothing attached to the Khimār. The Niqaab is a means of achieving the characteristics of the Jilbāb, but it is not the Jilbāb. This is a specific forbiddance of using the Niqaab. However, The Nabi (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) did not forbid the women from covering their faces with their Jilbābs. Hence, the women during the time of the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) knew their faces were ‘awrah in front of ajānib men and would cover their faces in front of them.

Read the following fatwa by the Hanbali scholar Ibn ‘Uthaymīn:

    “It is not narrated that the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa ‘alaa Aalihi wa sallam) forbade the woman in ihraam to cover her face; rather he forbade the niqaab only because it is worn on the face (i.e. Niqāb is the part that is separate from the garment and tied to the face, unlike that of covering the face with Jilbāb, as it it is part of the garment). He differentiated between the niqāb and covering the face. Based on this, if a woman in ihrām covers her face, we say there is nothing wrong with that, but it is better for her to uncover it so long as there are no non-mahram men around her, in which case she should cover her face from them.” [Al-Sharh al-Mumti’, 7/153]

c) The Nabi (SAWS) (Sallallahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam - Peace & Blessings be upon him) was with them and He (Sallallahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam - Peace & Blessings be upon him) approved of this noble action.

Proof 3:


وعن عائشة : ” …… وكان صفوان بن المعطل السلمي ثم الذكواني من وراء الجيش فأصبح عند
منزلي فرأى سواد إنسان نائم فعرفني حين رآني وكان رآني قبل الحجاب فاستيقظت
باسترجاعه حين عرفني فخمرت وجهي بجلبابي ” .
رواه البخاري ( 3910 ) ومسلم ( 2770 ) .

    It was narrated from ‘Aa’ishah that Safwaan ibn al-Mu’attal al-Sulami al Dhakwaani was lagging behind the army. She said, “He came to where I had stopped and saw the black shape of a person sleeping. He recognized me when he saw me, because he had seen me before Hijāb was enjoined. I woke up when I heard him saying ‘Inna Lillaahi wa inna ilayhi raaji’oon (verily to Allaah we belong and unto Him is our return),’ and I covered my face with my Jilbāb.” (Narrated by al-Bukhāri, kitāb al maghazi – bābu Hadīth ul ifk, 4141; Muslim, 2770)

The benefits of this hadīth are numerous; however we will just discuss those pertaining to Hijāb.

a) This hadīth took place with the issue of Ifk, where the Munaafiq (hypocrite), Abdullah ibn Ubai ibn Salool, slandered ‘Ai’shah and said that she committed Zinaa (fornication) with Safwān ibn Al Mu’attal. Allah (SWT) (Subhānahu wa ta’alā - Perfect and exalted is He) revealed her innocence and exposed the Munaafiqeen and their lies against her noble honor (refer to 24:11). Why would ‘Ai’shah mention that Safwan had seen her ‘before Hijāb was revealed’? Why would she mention that she covered her face with her Jilbāb? The reasons are obvious! Covering the face is a sign of chastity and honor. So by her doing just that, she was making it known to the people that she did not go with Safwan, except dressed as Allah (SWT) (Subhaanahu wa ta’alā - Perfect and exalted is He) had commanded her. Furthermore it was to show that the only reason why Safwan knew that it was ‘A’ishah was due to the fact that he had seen her BEFORE Hijāb was revealed.

b) This noble action of ‘A’ishah (may Allah (SWT) be pleased with her), shows us that the Jilbāb is that which covers the face, hence defining the objective of Jilbāb. The reader should remember that the command for Jilbāb is not just for the wives of the Messenger, but also for his daughters and the believing women. Thus A’ishah is proving to us how Jilbāb should be worn.

c) This also shows that any hadīth which mentions the showing of the face of a woman is abrogated. The fact that ‘A’ishah mentioned the Revealing of Hijāb and then her action of covering herself according to that revelation, is proof for this.

Proof 4: The Hadīth of Hafsah bint Sireen.


وعن عاصم الأحول قال : كنا ندخل على حفصة بنت سيرين وقد جعلت الجلباب هكذا : وتنقبت
به ، فنقول لها : رَحِمَكِ الله قال الله تعالى : ( وَالْقَوَاعِدُ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ
اللاَّتِي لاَ يَرْجُونَ نِكَاحاً فَلَيْسَ عَلَيْهِنَّ جُنَاحٌ أَن يَضَعْنَ
ثِيَابَهُنَّ غَيْرَ مُتَبَرِّجَاتٍ بِزِينَةٍ ) ، قال : فتقول لنا : أي شئ بعد ذلك
؟ فنقول : ( وَأَن يَسْتَعْفِفْنَ خَيْرٌ لَهُنَّ ) فتقول : هو إثبات الجلباب. رواه
البيهقي ( 7 / 93 (

    It was narrated that ‘Aasim al-Ahwal said: We used to enter upon Hafsah bint Sirīn who had put her Jilbāb thus and covered her face with it, and we would say to her: May Allah (SWT) have mercy on you. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And as for women past childbearing who do not expect wedlock, it is no sin on them if they discard their (outer) clothing in such a way as not to show their adornment” [al-Noor 24:60]. And she would say to us: What comes after that (of the āyah)? We would say: “But to refrain (i.e. not to discard their outer clothing) is better for them”. And so she said: [Referring to, 'But to refrain is better for them'], “It is to keep the Jilbāb.” [Narrated by al-Bayhaqi, 7/93. It is Authentic]

So Hafsah bint Sireen, the companion of Aa’ishah, covered her face by wearing the Jilbāb, even though as an old woman she did not have too. This narration is proof that Jilbāb is the garment that covers the woman’s face.

Proof 5: The Tafsīr of Abdullah Ibn ‘Abbās


حدثنـي علـيّ, قال: حدثنا أبو صالـح, قال: ثنـي معاوية, عن علـيّ, عن ابن عبـاس,
قوله: يا أيّها النّبِـيّ قُلْ لأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَناتِكَ وَنِساءِ الـمُؤْمِنِـينَ
يُدْنِـينَ عَلَـيْهِنّ مِنْ جَلابِـيبِهِنّ أمر الله نساء الـمؤمنـين إذا خرجن من
بـيوتهنّ فـي حاجة أن يغطين وجوههنّ من فوق رؤوسهنّ بـالـجلابـيب, ويبدين عينا
واحدة.

From Ibn ‘Abbās who said regarding this āyah,

    “Allah (SWT) commanded the believing women, when going out of their homes for some need, to cover their faces from above their heads with their Jilbābs, leaving one eye to see the path.”

[Tafsīr At-Tabari: It is at least Hasan.]

Some criticize this hadīth for being weak because of the disconnection between Ali ibn Abi Talhah and Abdullah Ibn ‘Abbās. The fact is they never met, however, Ali ibn Abi Talhah was a student of Ibn ‘Abbās’s major student, Mujāhid ibn Jabr.

Imām Al Mizzī says in his Tahthīb Al Kamāl regarding the Tafsīr from Ali ibn Abi Talhah from Ibn ‘Abbās:

    “It is mursal, and between them is Mujaahid ibn Jabr.”

In fact this Tafsīr goes through Mu’awiyah ibn Sālih from Ali from Ibn ‘Abbās. Regarding this chain Imām Adh-Dhahabi said,

    “I say: Mu’awiyah ibn Sālih reported from him (Ali ibn Abi Talhah) from Ibn ‘Abbās a great and delightful Tafsīr.” [Mīzān Al 'Itidāl 3/134 no. 5870]

Those who accepted these narrations from the Mufassireen (those who give Tafsīr - exegesis) are:

The Allamah (scholar) of Shām (Syria) Muhammad Jamāl Ad-Dīn Al-Qāsimi in his Mahāsin At-Ta’wīl, Imām Al Qurtubi in his Tafsīr , Ibn Kathīr in His Tafsīr , Imām ibn Jarīr At-Tabarī, and many others.

So the scholars of hadīth have accepted these narrations from Ali ibn Abi Talhah because the one between Ali and Abdullah Ibn ‘Abbās is known, and he is trustworthy. All of the men in this hadīth are acceptable. In fact, Imām Al-Bukhāri accepted Ali ibn Abi Talhah’s reports from Ibn ‘Abbās in his Sahīh. This hadīth is authentic and has been accepted by the scholars of hadīth such as Imām Adh-Dhahabee, Ibn Kathīr, Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Jareer At-Tabarī and many others.

To read more regarding the status of ‘Alī ibn Abī Talhah go to the following site: http://seekingilm.com/archives/9

Proof 6: The Tafsīr of ‘Abīdah As-Salmāni

Under the Tafsīr of this āyah throughout the books of tafasīr you find the following authentic narration,

    Hishām informed us, from Ibn Sireen who said: “I asked (as to what it meant) ‘Abīdah (as Salmaani) about the statement of Allah: “O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their Jalābīb all over their bodies…” So he took his thowb (garment) and covered his head and his face, and he left exposed one of his eyes. [Tafsīr of Imām Tabari under āyah 33:59 and it is Sahīh]

‘Abīdah As-Salmāni (radhiyallahu ‘Anhu) accepted Islām before the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) died, however he did not meet him. He is then considered a tābi’ee. He was from the companions of Imām ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib (alayhis Salām) and Abdullah ibn Mas’ood (Radhiya Allahu ‘Anhu). He was considered from amongst the Fuqahā’ (jurists) from the students of Ibn Mas’ūd (Radhiya Allāhu ‘Anhu). [See Tahthīb At-Tahthīb]

In this chain, reporting from ‘Abīdah is the great Tābi”ee Muhammad ibn Sīrīn. He is the Jurist, Scholar of Hadīth, Muhammad ibn Sīrīn who heard from Sahābah such as Anas ibn Maalik, Abdullah ibn ‘Umar, Abu Hurayrah, ‘Imrān ibn Husayn (as stated by Imām Ahmad), Zayd ibn Thābit and others. Ibn Sa’ad stated about him that he had a lot of knowledge and fiqh (understanding of the religion). So this is the first major Tābi’ī to bear witness to this fact that Jilbāb is a garment that used to cover the face.

This narration is a strong proof that these two great students of the Sahābah, saw their masters, the Sahābah implementing this āyah in this way. Hence, it is a strong proof that the face is covered by the Jilbāb.

Indeed there is another chain that goes through ‘Abīdah and his students. Ibn Jarīr At-Tabarī reports in his Tafsīr the following incident,


يعقوب ، قال : حدثنا ابن عُلَية ، عن ابن عون ، عن محمد ، عن عبيدة في قوله تعالى :
﴿ يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ
الْـمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ﴾ [ الأحزاب : 5 ]
فَلَبسَها عندنا ابن عون ، قال : وَلبسها عندنا محمد ، قال محمد : ولَبِسها عندي
عَبيدة ، قال ابن عون : فتقنَّعَ بردائه فغطّى أنفه وعينه اليسرى ، وأخرج عينه
اليمنى ، وأدنى رداءه من فوق حتى جعله قريبًا من حاجبه ، أو على الحاجب

    Ya’qūb said, Ibn ‘Ulayyah informed us, from Ibn ‘Awn from Muhammad (ibn Sireen) from ‘Abīdah regarding Surat Al Ahzāb Āyah 59,”So Ibn ‘Awn covered in front us, and Muhammad covered in front us and he said, ‘And ‘Abīdah covered in front of me.’ Ibn ‘Awn said, ‘So he veiled himself with his ridaa’ covering his mouth and his left eye, leaving his right eye showing, then he drew his ridā’ from above making it close to his eyebrow, or upon his eyebrow.”

[The chain of this hadīth is Sahīh (authentic). See ibn Jarīr's Tafsīr of this āyah.]

So we have Ibn ‘Awn, Muhammad ibn Sīrīn, and ‘Abīdah As-Salmāni stating that the Jilbāb covers the face. This is supporting proof that the Jilbāb covers the face.

Other Benefits from the Āyah:

• Allah (SWT) states the reason as to why they are to wear Jilbāb. It is to be known so as not to be annoyed. Meaning that they make themselves distinct from the prostitute or the slave, who do not wear Jilbāb, so as not to be harassed or looked at. Ibn Kathīr said when commenting on this part of the verse, “It is so they will be known that they are not slaves, or whores.” In other words, they are known as those free, believing women, noble and honorable. This is why Allah (SWT) (Subhaanahu wa ta’alā - Perfect and exalted is He) mentions the wives and the daughters first then the women of the believers, as they are the noblest of women.

• Another beneficial point is that the Jilbāb should be large enough to cover the entire body of the woman. The following hadīth expresses how large the Jilbāb really is.

Umm ‘Atiyyah (radhiya Allahu ‘Anhā) said, “Oh Rasoolullah! Some of us do not have with them a Jilbāb. The Messenger of Allah (SWT) said,


لتلبسها أختها من جلبابها

    “Let her sister cover her with her Jilbāb!” [Sahīh Muslim #890]

Imām Al Qurtubi when explaining the Jilbāb in his Tafsīr says,

    “…And [Jilbāb] is the garment that is larger than the khimār. And it is reported by Ibn ‘Abbās and Ibn Mas’ood that it is Ar-Ridaa’ (refers to any dress, robe, or large clothing). And it is said that it is Al-Qinaa’ (a mask, veil etc). And what is correct (sahīh) is that it is a garment that is used to cover the entire body. And in Sahīh Muslim is the hadīth from Umm ‘Atiyyah…” [Refer to Ahkaam Al Qur'aan of Imām Al Qurtubi]

He then mentions the above hadīth we just quoted from Umm ‘Atiyyah.

Ibn Hazm Al-Andalusī stated,

    “…And Jilbāb, in the language of the ‘Arabs that Rasoolullah (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) spoke to us with, is what covers all of the body not just a part of it.” [Al-Muhalla 3/212]

• Another issue that we have not really covered regarding this āyah is the statement within that goes,


يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ

    “…to draw their Jilbābs all over their bodies…”

The great Mufassir (exegete) and Imām Al-Ālūsī stated,

    “And the apparent, as to what is intended by the statement ‘Idnaa’ (to draw)’ means to put it upon every part of the body.” [See Rooh Al-Ma'āni]

The point here is that the Jilbāb is a garment that is large enough to cover two women, covering all of the body, and loose enough to not see the shape of the woman’s body.

Fifth Āyah 24:60


وَالْقَوَاعِدُ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ اللَّاتِـي لَا يَرْجُونَ نِكَاحًا فَلَيْسَ
عَلَيْهِنَّ جُنَاحٌ أَن يَضَعْنَ ثِيَابَهُنَّ غَيْرَ مُتَبَرِّجَاتٍ بِزِينَةٍ
وَأَن يَسْتَعْفِفْنَ خَيْرٌ لَّهُنَّ وَالله سَمِــيعٌ عَلِيمٌ

    “And as for women past child-bearing who do not expect wed-lock, it is no sin on them if they discard their (outer) clothing in such a way as not to show their Zīnah (adornment). But to refrain (i.e. not to discard their outer clothing) is better for them. And Allâh is All-Hearer, All-Knower.” (An-Nur 24:60)

Allah (SWT) has named a permissible exception. That is that women who have attained old age may uncover themselves, unlike women who have more beauty and are seeking to get married or able to have children. Ibn ‘Abbās (radhiya Allahu ‘Anhu) stated that the “clothing (thiyāb)” that they are to discard is the Jilbāb. [See Tafsīr Al Qurtubi and others]. However, Allah (SWT) (Subhaanahu wa ta’alā - Perfect and exalted is He) has clearly stated that they must refrain from committing Tabbarruj (want-on) display of their ‘awrah. Imām At-Tabari states that tabarruj is for a woman to display her charms and beauty. [Refer to Tafsīr At-Tabari]

Imām Abdur-Rahmān As-Sa’dī said regarding the part of this āyah that states, “…it is no sin on them to discard their clothing in such a way as not to show their zīnah…”

    ‘Meaning: Their apparent garments. Like her Khimār and similar to that, as Allah (SWT) ta’alā has said regarding the women, ‘and to draw their khumoor all over their juyubihinna’, so it is permissible to uncover their faces in the case of security from mahthoor (danger or harm) that may come from them, or may fall upon them.” [See Tafsīr Ibn As-Sa'dī 5/445]

A point to note from this tafsīr is that Sheikh Ibn As-Sa’dī is saying that the Khimār is the clothing that covers the face, and furthermore he is stating that the principle is that the woman must cover her face and that the exception is the elderly women. We mention this because some authors have stated that Imām Ibn As-Sa’adī has restricted the khimār to covering everything but the face. However, here he only mentions the khimār and then mentions the allowance of uncovering the face.

Even though it is permissible for them to uncover, what is preferred is that they cover the ‘awrah and they cover their entire body with their Jilbāb. This Āyah states another reason why women cover their entire bodies, and that is because of their natural adornment (face, bosoms etc). From this āyah it can be deduced that a woman covers her body to conceal her beauty, thus the logical question can be asked,

“What are the parts of the woman’s body that are beautiful?” The obvious answer would be the face. This āyah is proof that a woman who still has the ability to have children must cover her face. Recall the narration of Hafsah bint Sireen when she refrained from uncovering and stated that Jilbāb was the garment that covered the entire body.

Narrations from the Companions and Those Who Followed Them:

The following are some narrations from the salaf that have not been mentioned that support the stance that a woman’s entire body is ‘awrah in front of non-mahram men.

Supporting Proof 1: A Narration from Asmā’ bint Abi Bakr


وعن أسماء بنت أبى بكر رضي الله عنهما قالت : كنا نُغطِّي وجوهنا من الرجال ،
وكنَّا نمتشط قبل ذلك في الإحرام . رواه ابن خزيمة ( 4 / 203 ) ، والحاكم ( 1 / 624
) وصححه ووافقه الذهبي . وصححه الألباني في كتاب جلباب المرأة المسلمة

    From Asmā’ bint Abi Bakr, (Radhiya Allahu ‘Anhā), that she said, “We used (i.e. during the time of the Prophet) to cover our faces from the men, and cut our hair before that in Ihrām (for Hajj).

This hadīth is narrated by Ibn Khuzaymah 4/203, and Al Hākim and he declared it Sahīh according to the conditions of the two Shaykhs Al Bukhāri and Muslim. Imam Adh-Dhahabi agreed with him. Imam Al Albaani also declared it Sahīh in his Jilbāb Al-Mar’atu Muslimah.

“We used to cover our faces in front of men…” meaning we used to cover our faces in front of men who were non-mahram. This is proof that Asmā’ and the women who were other than the wives of the Prophet (Sallallahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam – Peace & Blessings be upon him) would cover their faces.

Supporting Proof 2: The narration from Fātimah bint Mundhir from Asmā’


عن هشام بن عروة عن فاطمة بنت المنذر أنها قالت : « كنا نُخمِّرُ وجوهنا ونحن
محرمات ، ونحن مع أسماء بنت أبي بكر الصديق »

From Hishaam ibn ‘Urwah from Fātimah bint Al-Mundhir that she said,

    “We would nukhammir (cover) our faces while we were Muhrimaat, and while doing that we would be with Asmā’ bint Abi Bakr As-Siddeeq.”

This hadīth is reported by Imām Maalik in his Muwatta’. In the Arabic edition it is on page 217. Its chain is Sahīh.

Interestingly enough, the word nukhammir comes from the root word khamr, which is also the same root word for khimār. All of these words refer to concealment and covering. Reflect oh noble reader upon the choice of words used by Fātimah bint Al-Munthir! This is proof that a woman must cover her face in front of non-mahram males.

Supporting Proof 3: The Statement of Ibn ‘Umar Analyzed

This proof comes from the previous discussion of Niqāb in Hajj. The hadīth we mentioned is as follows,


‏عَنْ ‏ ‏عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ ‏ ‏رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمَا ‏ ‏قَالَ ‏قَامَ
رَجُلٌ فَقَالَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ مَاذَا تَأْمُرُنَا أَنْ نَلْبَسَ مِنْ
الثِّيَابِ فِي الْإِحْرَامِ فَقَالَ النَّبِيُّ ‏ ‏صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ
وَسَلَّمَ ‏ ‏لَا تَلْبَسُوا الْقَمِيصَ وَلَا السَّرَاوِيلَاتِ وَلَا الْعَمَائِمَ
وَلَا ‏ ‏الْبَرَانِسَ ‏ ‏إِلَّا أَنْ يَكُونَ أَحَدٌ لَيْسَتْ لَهُ نَعْلَانِ
فَلْيَلْبَسْ الْخُفَّيْنِ وَلْيَقْطَعْ أَسْفَلَ مِنْ الْكَعْبَيْنِ وَلَا
تَلْبَسُوا شَيْئًا مَسَّهُ زَعْفَرَانٌ وَلَا ‏ ‏الْوَرْسُ ‏ ‏وَلَا تَنْتَقِبْ
الْمَرْأَةُ الْمُحْرِمَةُ وَلَا تَلْبَسْ الْقُفَّازَيْنِ

    It was narrated that ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (Radhiya Allahu ‘Anhu) said: “A man stood up and said, ‘O Messenger of Allaah, what kind of clothes do you command us to wear during ihrām?’ The Prophet (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) said: ‘Do not wear a shirt or pants or a turban or a burnous (hooded cloak). If one of you does not have any sandals then let him wear the khuffayn (leather slippers) and cut them so that they come below the ankle. Do not wear anything that has been dyed with saffron or turmeric. Women in ihraam should not wear niqāb or gloves.” (Narrated by al-Bukhāri , the book of Hajj; Muslim, 1177)

From this hadīth we learn that it was the natural practice of the women to wear niqaab in the lifetime of the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam).

Imām Ibn Taymiyyah said,

    “…It is proven in As-Sahīh that the woman in ihrām is forbidden to wear the niqaab and gloves. This is what proves that the niqaab and gloves were known among women who were not in ihraam. This implies that they covered their faces and hands.” (Majmoo’ al-Fatāwa, 15/371-372)

Sheikh Abdul Qādir ibn Abdul Azīz said while discussing the hadīth: ‘…and women in Ihrām should not wear Niqaab or gloves…’

    “And this hadīth indicated with its understanding - Mafhum Al-Mukhālafah - that the women in other than Ihrām is to wear the Niqāb and the gloves.” [Al Jāmi' Fi Talab Al-'Ilm Ash-Sharīf]

Supporting Proof 4: The Woman Who Wouldn’t Cover


رواه ابن أبي خيثمة ، من طريق إسماعيل بن أبي خالد ، عن أمه قالت : « كنا ندخل على
أم المؤمنين يوم التروية ، فقلت لها : يا أم المؤمنين ، هنا امرأة تأبى أن تغطيَ
وجهها وهي محرمة ، فرفعت عائشة خمارها من صدرها فغطَّت به وجهها »

Ibn Abi Khaythamah reports from the way of Ismaa’eel ibn Abi Khaalid from his mother that she said,

    “We entered upon Umm Al-Mu’minīn on Yawm At-Tarwayah and we said to her, ‘Oh Mother of the Believers! Here is a woman who refuses to cover her face and she is a Muhrimah (in ihrām). So ‘Aa’ishah lifted her Khimār from her chest, and covered the woman’s face with it.”

This hadīth has been mentioned in At-Talkhees Al-Habeer of Ibn Hajr Al-’Asqalaani 2/272 or number 1083 in some prints. The chain of this hadīth is strong. Notice here that she covered the woman’s face with her khimār. This is proof that the Sahabiyyat knew the khimār was meant to cover the face just as we stated previously. Furthermore, here is a woman who did not want to cover, so ‘Aa’ishah took it upon herself to cover the woman, as this would be changing an evil with her own hand. This is in compliance with the hadīth of the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) when he said, “When you see a munkar (evil), change it with your hand…” In this hadīth is proof that you must cover your face in front of non-mahram men.

Supporting Proof 5: Covering the Feet and the use of the Intellect


عن عبد الله بن عمر رضي الله عنه قال : قال رسول الله : « من جرَّ ثوبه خُيلَاء لم
ينظر الله إليه يوم القيامة ، فقالت أم سلمة : فكيف يصنَعْنَ النساءُ بذيولهن ؟ قال
: يُرخينَ شبرًا ، فقالت : إذًا تنكشف أقدامهن قال : فَيُرخينه ذراعًا لا يزِدْنَ
عليه »

    From Abdullah ibn ‘Umar who said, Rasoolullah (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) said, “Allah (SWT) will not look at the one who drags their garment out of Khuyalaa‘ (arrogance or pride). Umm Salamah said, “So what are the women to do about their hemlines on their dresses?” He said, “Drop them down the distance of a hands span.” She then said, “That will expose the women’s feet.” So the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) said, “So then let [the garment] fall down an arms span, [and] do not add anything to that.”

This hadīth has been reported by Imām At-Tirmithi in his Sunan after which he stated, “This hadīth is Hasan Sahīh.” It is also reported by Imām Ahmad ibn Hanbal in his Musnad 5/2 and 55, An-Nasaa’i 8/209, Abu ‘Awaanah 5/482, and Al-Bayhaqi 2/333. All of them have reported this by way of Ayyub from Naafi’ from Ibn ‘Umar. It is Sahīh!

Imām Al-Bayhaqi said after narrating this hadīth, “In this is proof that she must cover her feet.” Muhammad Al-Albāni said in Silsilat-As-Sahīhah that it was sahīh and he mentioned regarding it, “The feet of a woman are ‘awrah.”

Also, in the Sunan of Abu Dāwūd from Umm Salamah there is the following hadīth,

    Umm Salamah asked the Prophet (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam): “May a woman pray in a gown and a head covering without a waistcloth?”The Prophet (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) replied: “Yes, if the gown is long and covers her feet from the top.” [Sunan Abî Dâwûd - Abû Dâwûd comments: “Some have concluded that these words are actually the words of Umm Salamah.”]

The point here is that if women must cover their hair, arms, feet etc, then how is it that they would not cover their face in front of a non-mahram man? Isn’t the face more of an attraction than one’s feet or arms? Of course! We established previously that one of the reasons that Allah (SWT) has legislated Hijāb is due to the beauty of a woman. Although this is not the only reason, it is one of them, based upon the fact that Allah (SWT) gave the exception for older – less attractive women to uncover. So it is only logical, based upon all of these proofs, that a woman must cover her face in front of the non-mahram man, so that she will be known not to be bothered, so that she will not expose her adornment that will cause fitnah for the people, and so that she will be chaste and honourable. So by stating the feet are ‘awrah, we ask the simple question; how is it that the feet are more of a fitnah than the face?

We should state here that some women attempt to use the argument, “Well I am not attractive, hence I do not need to cover my entire body.”

Firstly, beauty is only a part of the reason why a woman covers her entire body, not the sole reason. So this argument is rejected. Allah (SWT) has legislated Hijāb upon all women, except the elderly. He did not give the exception for “ugly women.” Furthermore, Allah (SWT) legislated the Hijāb so that women may be known as free women, not be bothered. It is also a symbol of modesty and honour.

Secondly, what one person may deem ugly, another may deem beautiful. Indeed, beauty is within the eye of the beholder! Allah (SWT) has stated within the Qur’aan, “And I have created you in pairs.” So Allah (SWT) has a mate for you, it is simply a matter of finding them.

The Prophet (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) said, “Souls are like conscripted soldiers; those whom they recongnize, they get along with, and those who they do not recognize, they will not get along with.” [Reported by Al Bukhāri]

Hence, some people will naturally be attracted to others, while others will not be attracted to them. How many people do you know that may be considered physically ugly, are happily married? This should be an obvious response.

Step 3: Knowing the Statements of Some Scholars

These scholars are some of the scholars, from the past till present, that support the wearing of Niqāb. Note that this list does not contain all.

- The author of “Al-Mara’atu Muslimah”, Sheikh Wahby Sulaymān Al-Albānī says,

“And with this said, the Madhahib of the Fuquhaa’ (jurists) are in agreement, and the majority of the Ummah are upon the fact that it is not permissible for a young woman to uncover her face and hands in front of the Ajānib man. And the proof for this rule (referring to the young women and not the old) is the statement of Allah (SWT) ta’alā,


” وَالْقَوَاعِدُ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ”

    And as for women past child-bearing who do not expect wed-lock, it is no sin on them if they discard their (outer) clothing in such a way as not to show their adornment. But to refrain (i.e. not to discard their outer clothing) is better for them. And Allâh is All-Hearer, All-Knower. (An-Nur 24:60)And Adh-Dhurooraat (necessities) are an exception to all of this also by Ijmaa‘ (consensus). [See Al Mara'atu Muslimah pg 202-209]

- The Faqeeh and Qadhi Ibn Al ‘Arabī said,

    “And all of the woman is ‘awrah; her body, her voice, and it is not permissible for her to uncover that unless out of necessity, or need such as witnessing (in court), or a disease that is affecting her body…” [Ahkaam Al Qur'aan 3/1579]

- Imām An-Nawawi said,

    “The ‘Awrah of a free woman is everything but her hands and face…”Shaykh Sulaymān Al Jamal in his Haashiyah explaining what is meant says,”And this is her ‘awrah in Salah. And her ‘awrah amongst the muslim women and the Mahārim men (fathers etc) is what is between her navel and knees. And in front of Ajānib (foreign) men it is all of her body.”

-And Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdillah Al Jordāni said,

    “And know that Al-Awrah is of two types,1) ‘Awrah in the Salah
    2) ‘Awrah when she leaves it. And All of her is a must for her to cover.’ [Fat-thul 'Allām bi Sharh Murshid Al Anām]

- The Great Shafi’i Jurist Ash Sheikh Taqiyud Deen Al Hisni said,

    “And it is makrūh (hated) that one makes Salāh in a garment with pictures on it, and that a woman wear niqāb, unless she is in the masjid and in it are men who are ajānib, and they are not caring about looking, so if she fears that they are looking at her, it is harām for her to lift the niqāb, and this happens in a lot of places such as the going to Bayt Al Maqdis…”[Kifāyatul Akhyār 1/181]

- Ash-Shaykh Muhammad ibn Al Qāsim Al Ghazzi said,

    “And the entirety of the free woman is ‘awrah except her face and hands, and this is her ‘awrah in Salāh. As for her ‘awrah when she leaves Salah, then her ‘awrah is all of her body.” [Fat-hul Qarīb bi Sharh Al-Faath At Taqrīb]

- The Faqīh and Mufassir Ibn Jarīr At-Tabarī said regarding the Āyah of Jilbāb that has preceded (33:59),

    “Allah (SWT) ta’alā said mentioning to his Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) (Sallalllahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) “Oh Prophet! Say to your wives your daughters and the women of the believers; do not imitate the dress of the slave women. When you leave from your homes for some need, then cover your hair and your faces…”[Tafsīr At-Tabari below āyah 59 of surah 33]

- The Hanafī Mufassir Abu Bakr Al Jassās said after the āyah of 33:59,

    “In this Āyah is proof that the young woman is commanded to cover her face from Ajānib men and to display chastity (modesty etc.) when leaving (the home).” [Ahkaam Al Qur'aan 3:458]

Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

    “Allah (SWT) commands women to let the Jilbāb come down (over their faces) so that they will be known (as respectable women) and not be annoyed or disturbed. This evidence supports the first opinion. ‘Abīdah al-Salmāni and others stated that the women used to wear the Jilbāb coming down from the top of their heads in such a manner that nothing could be seen except their eyes, so that they could see where they were going [authors note: This narration is authentic and its chain can be found in the Tabari's Tafsīr of the āyah 33:59]. It was proven in As-Sahīh that the woman in ihraam is forbidden to wear the niqaab and gloves. This is what proves that the niqaab and gloves were known among women who were not in ihraam. This implies that they covered their faces and hands.” (Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 15/371-372)

Imām Muhammad As-Sana’nī in his Subul As-Salām says,

    “And it is permissible for her to uncover her face whenever there is proof that she does not have to cover. What is meant by uncovering (her face and hands) in the Salah is that no Ajnabi (foreign, non-related, marriageable man) is looking at her, and this is the ‘awrah in the Salah. As for her ‘Awrah when an Ajnabi man is looking at her, then all of her body is ‘awrah.” [Refer to Subul As-Salām]

- Al-Hāfidh ibn Hajr Al ‘Asqalāni said in his Fat-hul Bāri,


لم تزل عادة النساء قديمًا وحديثاً يسترن وجوههن عن الأجانب

    “And it has not ceased to be a custom for women, from the older generations and the newer ones, to cover their faces from non-related men.” [Fat-hul Bāri 9/235]

- Imām Ibn Rislān said,

    “The Muslims are in agreement that it is prohibited for women to come out of their homes while their faces are uncovered.” [See Nayl Al Awtār 6/114]

- Ash-Shaykh Siddīq Hasan Khān said when talking about the Shurūt (conditions) of Salah,

    “And it is permissible to show her face when there is no proof for covering it, and what is meant by uncovering it (the face) in Salah is that no Ajnabi (foreign non-marriageable non-mahram) looks at her, and this is her ‘Awrah in Salah. Regarding her ‘Awrah when an Ajnabi is looking at her, then all of her [body] is ‘Awrah. [Fat-hul-'Allām 1/97]

The Hanbalī Jurist of his time, Imām Al-Hajjāwī and Imām Al-Bahūtī state in Kash-shāf Al-Qinā’ Sharh Matn Al Iqnā’ the following. Note that anything in [] are the words of Imām Al-Hajjāwī who is the author of Al-Iqnā’. The explanation of this book is done by Al-Bahūtī and his statements are not in brackets.

    [Imām al-Hajjāwī states, “[and the free, mature, woman, all of her (body) is ‘awrah in Salāh, including her fingernails and her hair…] Imām Al Bahūtī states after that, “Due to the statement of the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallallahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam),1. It is reported by At-Tirmithī who said, ‘Hasan Sahīh’. And from Umm Salamah that she asked the Nabi (SAWS) (Sallallahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam), ‘Can a woman make Salāh in a dira’ and khimār without an Izār upon her? The Nabi (SAWS) (Sallallahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) said,2. It is reported by Abū Dāwūd, and Abdul-Haqq and other than him authenticated that it is mawqūf (i.e. it is actually the statement of Umm Salamah) up to Umm Salamah. [Then Hajjāwī said:] […except her face] Imām Al-Bahūtī continues, “There is disagreement in the madh-hab (guild or school of law): A) That it is permissible for a free woman to unveil her face in Salāh. It (i.e. this opinion) is mentioned in Al Mughnī and elsewhere. B) Her hands as well. This was the chosen opinion of Al-Majd (i.e. Majd-ad-dīn ibn Taymiyyah – the grandfather of the well-known ibn taymiyyah). It was also the determined (opinion) in [the books] Al ‘Umdah and Al Wajīz due to the statement of Allāh ta’alā (the exalted) “And not to expose her adornment, except the apparent thereof…(surah Nūr:31)”. Ibn ‘Abbās, and ‘Ā’ishah (Radhiya Allahu ‘Anhumā) said (regarding this verse), “[It means] Her face and her hands”. It is reported by Imām Al Bayhaqī and in it is dha’f (weakness in the chain). And they were contradicted by Ibn Mas’ūd (Radhiya Allahu ‘Anhu).Imām Hajjāwī continues, [And the two of them (wa humā)] Meaning the hands. [And her face] of the free mature woman [are ‘awrah when she leaves it] meaning when she leaves the Salāh. [With consideration to looking, like the remainder of her body] Due to what is preceded from where He (Sallallahu ‘Alayhi wa Sallam) said,3.

[Taken from Vol. 1 page 266 published by Maktabah An-Nasr Al-Hadīthah of Riyādh, Saudi ‘Arabia. The publishing date is unidentified, however, this copy that I have has been given as a gift to a prestigious University by the Library of Congress Public Law 480 program on 9/24/1970. Hence, this print is at least 36 years old. It also has the references and footnotes provided by the Azharian scholar and faqīh Hilāl Musaylīhī Mustafā Hilāl, the teacher of law and Tawhīd at Azhar Sharīf. It is printed in six volumes.]

The Imām of the Shāfi’ī’s, Imām Al-Juwaynī stated,

    “There is agreement (ittifāq) of the Muslimīn upon the forbiddance of women coming out (of their homes) with their faces unveiled.”

[Quoted in Tuhfat Al-Minhāj Bi-Sharh Al-Minhāj of Ibn Hajr Al-Haytamī, Vol. 7 page 193, published by Dār Al-Fikr. Also quoted by Imām An-Nawawī in his Rawdhat-Tālibīn. Also quoted by Imām Taqiyud-dīn Abū Bakr ibn Muhammad Al-Husaynī Ad-Dimashqī Ash-Shāfi’ī in his Kifāyatul Akhyār Vol. 2 page 42. This statement is also quoted from him in Imām Al-Khatīb Ash-Shirbinī’s Al-Mughnī Al-Muhtāj.]

We that this article has shown that many of the scholars, based upon clear proofs, believe the face of a woman to be ‘awrah in front if the ajnabī.

Click Here to Read Part 2

Article Last Updated with Proofs on: April 4, 2007

Footnotes (Click ↩ at the end of the note to Go Back to Original Place in the article) :
  1. The woman is ‘awrah []
  2. As long as the dira’ (wrap around garment) is long enough to cover the tops of her feet []
  3. The woman is ‘awrah []

5 Comment(s)

  1. On Mar 23, 2007, Umm Ayesha said:

    Assalaamu `Alaikum

    Jhazzak’Allaahu Khairun Insha’Allah (SWT), Can’t wait for Part 2

    Bout time an article like this come out, May Allah (SWT) Azza wa jal Reward the Seeking Ilm staff for producting this Article, Ameen. Wassalam

  2. On Sep 4, 2007, Abdullah Al Murabit said:

    Niqab is not required in the Islamic Law

    Allah (SWT) says in the most Holy Quran “And Say to the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (see the explanation below), and to draw their veils all over Juyubihinna” (Surah An-Nur, Verses #30 and #31)

    We will see how the Salaf understood this matter:

    1) The opinion of the Sahaba:
    Ibn Abbas (ra) is one of the most learned men of the Sahaba (Companions). Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) (saw) even prayed for him saying “O Allah (SWT), make him acquire a deep understanding of the religion of Islam and instruct him in the meaning and interpretation of things.” He with reference to Surah An-Nur “except only that which is apparent” as Ibn Kathir narrated with a Sahih (authentic) chain of narrators, said it’s “The hand, the ring, and the face.” Abdullah Ibn Omar Ibn Al-Khattab (ra) said “the face and the two hands”. Anas Ibn Malik (ra) said “the hand and the ring”. Ibn Hazm said: “all of this (statements) are in the highest of accuracy. And so are statements by Ali (ra), Aisha (ra), and other Tabi’een”.

    Now you have to think who would understand these verses better than Aisha (ra) the MOST knowledgeable woman in the matters of Islam and the wife of Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) (saw)?

    2) Scholars among the Tabi’een had many opinions on this matter:
    Some said a woman should cover all of her body except the face and the hands. This is the saying of Imam Malik, Al-Hadi, Al-Qasim (in one of his narrations), and Imam Abu Hanifa (in one of his two narrations).

    Some said she should cover all her body except the face, the hands, and the foot. This is the saying of Imam Abu Hanifa (in another narration), Al-Qasim, and Ath-thouri. Some said she should cover all her body except the face. This is the saying of Ibn Hanbal and Dawood.

    No one said the face of a woman is loins (‘Aura) except a weak narration from Ibn Hanbal and some Shafi’i scholars!

    Sa’id ibn Jubayr, ‘Ata and al-Awzai have stated explicitly that the showing of the face and hands is permissible. ‘Aishah (ra), Qatadah, and others have added bracelets to what may be shown of the adornments; this interpretation implies that a part of the arm may also be shown. Various scholars (such as Abu Yusuf) have allowed the exposure of the lower part of the arm up to a length varying between about four inches to one-half of the arm.

    Ibn Hazm is the Imam of the Dhahiri schools (Literal schools) mentioned many accidents prove that it is not required for a woman to cover her face.

    3) The opinion of late scholars:
    Assuredly a woman is permitted to show her face and hands because covering them would be a hardship on her, especially if she must go out on some lawful business. For example, a widow may have to work to support her children, or a woman who is not well-off may have to help her husband in his work; had covering the face and hands been made obligatory, it would have occasioned such women hardship and distress. Al-Qurtabi says, it seems probable that, since the face and hands are customarily uncovered, and it is, moreover, required that they be uncovered during acts of worship such as Salat and Hajj, the exemption (referred to in the verses of Surah al-Nur) pertains to them.

    In addition to this, we may infer from Allah (SWT)’s words, “Tell the believing men that they should lower their gazes”, that the faces of the women of the Prophet’s time were not veiled. Had the entire body including the face been covered, it would have made no sense to command them to lower their gaze, since there would have been nothing to be seen.

    Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin: Asma, daughter of AbuBakr, entered upon the Apostle of Allah (SWT) (saw) wearing thin clothes. The Apostle of Allah (SWT) (saw) turned his attention from her. He said: O Asma’, when a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it does not suit her that she displays her parts of body except this and this, and he pointed to her face and hands. (Narrated by Abu Dawood # 4092).

    This Hadith has three authentic narrations and was correct by all Major Hadith scholars such as Albani.

    Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Abbas: Al-Fadl (his brother) was riding behind Allah (SWT)’s Apostle and a woman from the tribe of Khath’am came and Al-Fadl started looking at her and she started looking at him. The Prophet turned Al-Fadl’s face to the other side. The woman said, “O Allah (SWT)’s Apostle! The obligation of Hajj enjoined by Allah (SWT) on His devotees has become due on my father and he is old and weak, and he cannot sit firm on the Mount; may I perform Hajj on his behalf?” The Prophet replied, “Yes, you may.” That happened during the Hajj-al-Wida (of the Prophet). (Narrated by Bukhari # 589, Muslim, and others).

    This Hadith is very authentic since it was narrated by Bukhari and Muslim. If she was covering her face then Ibn Abbas would know that she is beautiful! Also prophet (saw) did not order the girl to cover her face. This hadith was not abrogated since it happened during Hajj-al-Wida (10 AH) while the Aya of Hijab was revealed in the 5th year after the Hijra.

  3. On Sep 5, 2007, Abul Layth said:

    1) The opinion of the Sahaba:
    Ibn Abbas (ra) is one of the most learned men of the Sahaba (Companions). Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) (saw) even prayed for him saying “O Allah (SWT) , make him acquire a deep understanding of the religion of Islam and instruct him in the meaning and interpretation of things.” He with reference to Surah An-Nur “except only that which is apparent” as Ibn Kathir narrated with a Sahih (authentic) chain of narrators, said it’s “The hand, the ring, and the face.” Abdullah Ibn Omar Ibn Al-Khattab (ra) said “the face and the two hands”. Anas Ibn Malik (ra) said “the hand and the ring”. Ibn Hazm said: “all of this (statements) are in the highest of accuracy. And so are statements by Ali (ra), Aisha (ra), and other Tabi’een”.

    Now you have to think who would understand these verses better than Aisha (ra) the MOST knowledgeable woman in the matters of Islam and the wife of Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) (saw)?

    We have shown the weakness in the chains. Again you ignore 33:59. Further, Why don’t you go ahead and mention the many reports of ‘Aa’ishah covering her face, as well as promoting the women amongst her to do so? Or do you realize that if you do, your argument falls apart!?

    2) Scholars among the Tabi’een had many opinions on this matter:
    Some said a woman should cover all of her body except the face and the hands. This is the saying of Imam Malik, Al-Hadi, Al-Qasim (in one of his narrations), and Imam Abu Hanifa (in one of his two narrations).
    Some said she should cover all her body except the face, the hands, and the foot. This is the saying of Imam Abu Hanifa (in another narration), Al-Qasim, and Ath-thouri. Some said she should cover all her body except the face. This is the saying of Ibn Hanbal and Dawood.

    No one said the face of a woman is loins (‘Aura) except a weak narration from Ibn Hanbal and some Shafi’i scholars!

    This is a lie on Imam Ahmad, and you can see the Hanbalīs quoting him regarding this. Imam Al-Hajjāwī, Imām Al-Bahūtī, Ibn Taymiyya and the school of the Hanbalis agree that the face of the woman is ‘awrah in nathr. We have quoted them extensively. See for yourself the lies of the above quote by reading the article!

    It is true that the Ahnāf maintain that the face is not ‘awrah. However, they say that it is wājib to cover the face when there is fitnah, especially in front of the non-related man.

    The Hanafi Mujtahid ‘Alim Damaadafaandi (داماد افندي )after mentioning the words in al-muntaqaa that state that a woman covers her face when she fears fitnah,

    “And in our times (zamaaninaa) the forbiddance (of uncovering the face - kashf) is waajib, rather it is Fardh due to the ghalabah (governance, domination, etc) of Fasaad (all types of evil such as zinaa specifically). And it is reported from ‘Aa’ishah that all of the free woman is ‘awrah except for one of her eyes, so this is adequate (or i.e. considered), due to the actuation of the necessity (dhroorah).”

    [This quote can be found in Majma' al-anhar, sharh muntaqaa al abhar]

    Furthermore, Another Hanafi Imaam, Shaykh Haskafi (الحصكفي ) stated, “And it is forbidden for a mature woman to expose her face while amongst men, not due to it being ‘awrah, but due to the fitnah.”

    [Ad-Durr Al Mukhtaar in the Haamish of Haashiyah of Ibn 'Aabideen]

    Another Hanafi ‘Aalim, Ibn Nujaym (ابن نجيم ) Rahimahullah stated,

    قال مشايخنا : تمنع المرأة الشابة من كشف وجهها بين الرجال في زماننا للفتنة

    “Our Scholars have stated: The mature woman is forbidden from uncovering her face while amongst men, in our times, due to the fitnah!”

    [Al-Bahr Ar-Raa'iq Sharh Kanz Ad-Daqaa'iq]

    As for the author’s claim of “some of the Shafi’is”, then this statement is inaccurate. Imām Al-Juwaynī and Ibn Rislaan quote agreement of the scholars that women are not allowed to go out of their homes with their faces uncovered. Imām An-Nawawī quotes this on several occasions. Imām Al-Ghazzālī also holds that it is necessary for the woman to cover her face in front of non-related men. Ibn Nāqib Al-Masrī in his Shafi’ī primer, “Umdat As-Sālik” declared that there is agreement of the Muslims on this fact. Imām Taqiyud-Dīn Al-Hisnī also believes it to be wājib. Ibn Hajr Al-’Asqalaani defends this stance in his Fat-h and elsewhere. Please see the article so that you can see for yourself the official stance of the Shāfi’ī school.

    Sa’id ibn Jubayr, ‘Ata and al-Awzai have stated explicitly that the showing of the face and hands is permissible. ‘Aishah (ra), Qatadah, and others have added bracelets to what may be shown of the adornments; this interpretation implies that a part of the arm may also be shown. Various scholars (such as Abu Yusuf) have allowed the exposure of the lower part of the arm up to a length varying between about four inches to one-half of the arm.

    If these reports are authentic, then one can see bracelets without seeing skin. It also goes to prove that the CLOTHING is what is apparent, as is authentically narrated from Ibn Mas’ūd Radhiya Allahu ‘Anhu.

    3) The opinion of late scholars:
    Assuredly a woman is permitted to show her face and hands because covering them would be a hardship on her, especially if she must go out on some lawful business. For example, a widow may have to work to support her children, or a woman who is not well-off may have to help her husband in his work; had covering the face and hands been made obligatory, it would have occasioned such women hardship and distress. Al-Qurtabi says, it seems probable that, since the face and hands are customarily uncovered, and it is, moreover, required that they be uncovered during acts of worship such as Salat and Hajj, the exemption (referred to in the verses of Surah al-Nur) pertains to them.

    In addition to this, we may infer from Allah (SWT) ’s words, “Tell the believing men that they should lower their gazes”, that the faces of the women of the Prophet’s time were not veiled. Had the entire body including the face been covered, it would have made no sense to command them to lower their gaze, since there would have been nothing to be seen.

    Does hardship determine what is harām and halāl? We make Salāh while in WAR! Is that not a hardship?! We are obliged to fast while travelling if after fajr (according to the shafi’iyya), is that not hardship? Some could argue that Salāh period is a hardship, or that fasting period is a hardship.

    The law is the law, and part of its implementation is struggle. If someone is obliged to do something, they do it. The excuse of relative hardship is not a proof at all. Millions of women cover their faces and they do not say it is a hardship.

    As for the argument that lowering the gaze nullifies Hijaab, then this is non-sense.

    A) It is possible that parts of a woman be exposed accidentally, hence the necessity of lowering the gaze.

    B) The woman’s eye’s are showing, and can be fitnah.

    C) There were both jew and christian women in Arabia (and elsewhere), hence it is necessary to lower the gaze in front them as they did not cover their bodies properly.

    D) Mushrikeen still existed in Makkah and Arabia, and they did not cover their bodies. Hence the necessity to lower one’s gaze.

    E) Slave women in those times were naked as well. And the majority of scholars say in such cases it is necessary to lower the gaze.

    Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin: Asma, daughter of AbuBakr, entered upon the Apostle of Allah (SWT) (saw) wearing thin clothes. The Apostle of Allah (SWT) (saw) turned his attention from her. He said: O Asma’, when a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it does not suit her that she displays her parts of body except this and this, and he pointed to her face and hands. (Narrated by Abu Dawood # 4092).

    Weak. We have explained why in the second article and responded to the claims of Muhammad Al Albaani, who himself contradicts himself and his own principles regarding Ibn Lahī’ah in the chain!

    Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Abbas: Al-Fadl (his brother) was riding behind Allah (SWT) ’s Apostle and a woman from the tribe of Khath’am came and Al-Fadl started looking at her and she started looking at him. The Prophet turned Al-Fadl’s face to the other side. The woman said, “O Allah (SWT) ’s Apostle! The obligation of Hajj enjoined by Allah (SWT) on His devotees has become due on my father and he is old and weak, and he cannot sit firm on the Mount; may I perform Hajj on his behalf?” The Prophet replied, “Yes, you may.” That happened during the Hajj-al-Wida (of the Prophet). (Narrated by Bukhari # 589, Muslim, and others).

    Not proof at all. We have responded to this in the second article. You should read it there. To read it please go here:

    http://seekingilm.com/archives/47#fadhl

    Shukran,
    Abul Layth

  4. On Oct 1, 2007, UMM ABDULLAH said:

    Akhee i must congratulate on posting this article which is Masha’Allah (SWT) comprehensive full of evidences and concise. We must continue to defend the hijab and make dua for ALL muslim women and men May Allah (SWT) guide them to their deen and bless them with a deeper understanding and appreciation. Ameen
    your appreciative sister in islaam

  5. On Oct 2, 2007, Abul Layth said:

    Jazaakum Allahu Khairan Umm Abdullah. I am glad you benefited from it, and hope that others benefit from it as well.

    -Abul Layth

3 Trackback(s)

  1. Seeking Ilm (Knowledge) » Blog Archive » A Response to the Lies Regarding Niqab by Some Pseudo-Sufi Murabits on Aug 10, 2007
  2. Part-Time Niqabi? - Page 3 - Forums - Islamica Community on Oct 23, 2007
  3. Face cover: God's only flaw? - Page 2 - Forums - Islamica Community on Dec 22, 2007

Post a Comment